“Band of Sisters” documentary about liberal women religious premiers at Sinsinawa Mound

bandofsistersI and a friend attended a Sunday, Jan 13, 2013 premier showing of the new documentary film about liberal religious sisters, Band of Sisters at Sinsinawa Mound, the motherhouse of the Sinsinawa Dominican Sisters.

The film centers on some liberal women religious who are former heads of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, NETWORK progressive political lobby, and some of their friends. Featured in the film: Reiki, “women’s ordination”, animals, plants, rocks and air have rights from the same source as humans have rights and one species shouldn’t be privileged over others, “the whole earth is a manifestation of God”, and the Sisters’ new cosmology apparently doesn’t have a heaven and hell anymore. Jesus is hardly mentioned. The film also shows one or two of their ministries that seem good. But so many of the beliefs highlighted aren’t those of the Catholic Church, and some of the Sisters in the film are key dissident figures, like Sr Theresa Kane in regards to “women’s ordination” and Sr Jeannine Grammick in regards to homosexual behavior. There’s no narration but it does present a certain angle on the story of American women religious and obviously a heavy concentration on some in leadership roles who hold dissenting views.

Although there wasn’t actually a standing ovation, the film was warmly praised by other attendees. I heard Sinsinawa Dominicans say: “I wonder if she went in the Academy Awards for best documentary!” “I saw so many people I knew, it’s like a reunion!” “The film was true to my lived experience. We’ve been part of something growing like yeast, we’ve been on a trajectory. You [filmmaker Mary Fishman] did it the best I’ve ever seen.” In talking with several Sinsinawa Dominican Sisters after the showing, I was sad not to find one who believed, for instance, the infallible Catholic teaching that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women. They were nice to me, they were hospitable, they seemed rather sweet, and I would have been consoled to get to know one who supported Catholic doctrine completely. Sisters whom I and my friend spoke with also seem to believe and highly value Vatican II about “follow your conscience” but disbelieve Vatican II about us being gravely obliged to form our Catholic conscience in keeping with the Church’s teaching (Dignitatis Humanae).

This is a long post thrown together late at night full of raw information of what I heard, and I apologize that it’s not a neat edited presentation. I am going to tell you much more about the film and my conversations with Sinsinawa Dominicans (scroll down if you want to go right to that), but first some background on Band of Sisters.

According to the website of this new documentary film:

Band of Sisters tells the story of Catholic nuns and their work for social justice after Vatican II of the 1960s. For Catholics who wonder what became of the nuns they knew in habits and convents many years ago, for activists who may feel profoundly discouraged given the problems of today’s world, for women seeking equality in their church, and for people of all faiths yearning for an inclusive and contemplative spirituality, Band of Sisters challenges us to ask what really matters in life. And as we seek what matters, how do we go about changing our lives and the world around us?

So, it has a lot to do with Sisters as liberal change-agents. The filmmaker is Mary Fishman of Chicago, a lay associate of the Sisters of Mercy who realized when she started filming in 2007, “2 years before the Apostolic Visitation and the LCWR investigation were announced, the conflict between U.S. women religious and the church hierarchy (over the role of women in the church, the rights and intrinsic goodness of gay and lesbian persons, the primacy of one’s conscience in making moral decisions, etc.) was a situation I was well aware of and wanted to address somehow in the film.” However she says she mainly wanted it to be about how religious life changed after Vatican II. Here’s the trailer, which alludes to the role of the Civil Rights Era in this change of focus for some religious communities:

There are a variety of things to notice here. What I most want to point out is the Sister who says “I did exactly what the Church told me to do.” She’s a key figure both onscreen and in the making of the film: Sister Nancy Sylvester, IHM, who is involved with the notorious dissident group “Call to Action“, and also a past president of the powerful Leadership Conference of Women Religious, of which the Sinsinawa Dominicans are a member order, and also former National Director of NETWORK Lobby, the progressive political group that did the Nuns on the Bus tour (which also by the way stopped at Sinsinawa Mound) and that was singled out by the Congregegation for the Doctrine of the Faith as a problematic group that LCWR was required to dissociate itself from (many of the Sisters in the film are associated with NETWORK). A Catholic World Report article titled “Post-Christian Sisters” says:

In her presidential address [to the LCWR], Sister Nancy Sylvester talked about LCWR’s “tension and conflict” with the Vatican, stating, “We believe in the power to change unjust structures and laws. We respect loyal dissent.” She continued that the sisters had been “disappointed, frustrated, angered, and deeply saddened by official responses that seem authoritarian, punitive, disrespectful of our legitimate authority as elected leaders, and disrespectful of our capacity to be moral agents.” She then presented what she called a “casualty list” sustained from dealings with Church officials. That list of injuries included: sisters who had signed the New York Times 1984 abortion statement; the 1995 Vatican letter on the ordination of women; theologians and scholars who had been silenced by the Church; the canonical approval of the alternate superiors’ conference; and the CDF discipline of Sister Jeannine Gramick. In conclusion, Sister Nancy observed: “I do believe that we are at an impasse with the official church that we love,” and she speculated about whether the Vatican would de-legitimize the LCWR.

Another Sister in the film is Theresa Kane, another LCWR past president who most famously confronted Pope John Paul to his face with a call for women to be ordained (something the Church definitively has absolutely no authority to do)–and still feels the same way. Another is Sr Carol Coston, founder of NETWORK, who, together with Kane, signed “NCAN” dissident sisters’ group’s letter protesting canonical censure for notorious and later involuntarily laicized “women’s ordination” activist Fr Roy Bourgeois. Another is Sr Margaret Brennan, another former LCWR president and very dissident theologian who has also advocated for “women priests“. Appearing briefly in the film (at least the part I saw) in  convivial conversation with Sr Nancy Sylvester and a couple of the film’s other featured Sisters, is Sr Jeannine Grammick, an intransigent supporter of homosexual behavior, who has continued to disobey the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith which prohibited her from ministering to same sex attracted individuals. You get the idea, this is a troubled bunch.

At any rate, the Sinsinawa Dominican Sisters announced that their motherhouse, Sinsinawa Mound, would be one of the sites of the premier through all their channels of communication, including their website, facebook, and twitter. Although I have seen them announce many of their events in the Madison Catholic Herald diocesan newspaper, news of the movie showing doesn’t appear there, either because it wasn’t submitted or because it wasn’t welcome–though the Jan 10 issue does include a lengthy and lovely story (not available online) in a “Vocations” theme section, about a local young woman who joined the habit wearing, joyful, thriving (nay, BOOMING with vocations), faithful Dominican Sisters of Mary, Mother of the Eucharist of Ann Arbor, MI. And there’s a prominent article about a Jan 19th showing of the pro-life feature film “October Baby”, in Verona.

Anyway, I  and my friend, “K”, got there a bit late, apparently missing some historical background from the filmmaker and the beginning of the film, but I think we saw most of it.

At the Sinsinawa Mound Auditorium, this is after the film but before the questions, and the crowd had already thinned a bit
From my notes, scrawled in the dark, and not guaranteed to be perfect quotes, though if I put it in quotation marks I believe this was close to what was said:

  • Genesis Farm was the first “ecological farm” founded by Sisters. An important figure in Genesis Farm’s philosophy is Thomas Berry (at this link to the farm’s website, he advocates that every component of the earth has rights) who says some things in the film that Catholics may find unusual, such as “none of the religions have shown a responsibility to the fate of the earth.”
  • Santuario Sisterfarm in Boerne, TX cultivates biodiversity and human diversity, and advocates living in a way that is protective, appreciative and fair to all the creatures.
  • One of the stories of Sisters’ ministry that the film follows is Sisters who want to minister in a prison (they also “give blessings”?) and face barriers to getting in, and feel looked down upon and scorned. A legislator assures them that a new IL law requires that they be allowed access. In a later segment, the Sisters have been ministering to men and women at the prison for 2 years and a sheriff explained that the issue was trust, the prison administrators didn’t have that trust before, and now they do. An inmate shared his insight their care helped him with, that all people are his brothers and sisters including other inmates and also the guards and he should treat them as such.
  • A Sister explains that for modern Sisters like her (many not only have a paying secular job but live independently in secular housing), religious poverty works like this: we give all our money/paycheck to the congregation, then make a personal budget, and the congregation gives that amount back to us.
  • The deaths of 4 Catholic nuns (and 6 Jesuits) in El Salvador motivated a lot of Sisters to get involved with demonstrations for the first time, which had a profound effect. This apparently became the School of the Americas Watch demonstration (this was founded by Fr Roy Bourgeois, not mentioned in the film though I wonder if he is in some of the old footage they show, who last year was involuntarily laicized for his “womenpriests” activism) against the school they hold responsible because the perpetrators of these war crimes received training there (though one must admit they themselves and not the school or US Military decided to kill innocent religious). A Sister recounts her decision to get arrested and her solidarity in that moment with a surviving family member of one of the El Salvador victims.
  • We are introduced to a Milwaukee center called CORE/El Centro that serves poor and non-poor people with exercise and alternative health services. These include accupuncture (which a Hispanic woman client tells us was used to treat her diabetes), massage, Reiki (which the US Bishops have said “is not compatible with either Christian teaching or scientific evidence”), energy work (same problems as Reiki, in fact arguably accupuncture has similar problems if you buy into the spiritual beliefs behind it), and holistic exercise.
  • Vatican II stated a universal call to Holiness. For a Sister in the film, this means no way of life is higher or better than another, and “opened the Church to the laity.” Some Sisters were upset, thinking, isn’t this way of life holier? Shock followed–“we had all these people leaving.” There was literally an exodus, they saw they could continue to serve the Gospel in other ways than the religious life, the celibate life.
  • We are introduced to a former sister who tells us: “I was active in the women’s ordination movement. I saw the consequences and impact of my activism and decided conflict in myself was not abating, so I sought dispensation from the Sisters of Mercy… most painful decision of my life, but the most honest way to go.” (yes) Now she directs a ministry program for laity, at a college.
  • Sr Margaret Brennan, as a Major Superior, interviewed 300 who left.
  • Some kind of a70s era protest march singing: “We are a gentle angry people…”
  • Pope John Paul II came to the US and Sr Theresa Kane, president of the LCWR, is shown in a generous amount of archive footage of her famous act of defiance, speaking up to the Pope that the Church “must…include women in all ministries of the Church” (her full remarks at this link).
  • Sr Jeannine Grammick, the famously intransigent supporter of homosexual behavior , appears in a scene of Sisters quite excitedly reminiscing about that famous moment, Sr Nancy Sylvester participates animatedly, also Sr Christine Schenck the head of the dissident change-the church organization FutureChurch, together with of course Sr Theresa Kane. (I think this scene perhaps takes the cake) “LCWR inspired us”
  • We are told that most American nuns see the Vatican as conservative and hardline and don’t expect changes for years.
  • Sr Teresa Kane talks about forming the LCWR. The Pope and bishops asked for LCWR to be founded, “but now we think they don’t want it.”
  • We are told not to worry about not having new vocations, religious life was never that big.
  • Sr Yolanda Tolango talks about the Apostolic Visitation of “active” women religious in the US, and meeting with the visitator. The way the questions of the questionnaire were asked assumed a different lifestyle than what they live, “questions we couldn’t relate to” therefore some questions went unanswered.
  • Sr Lillian Murphy says of the visitation, “we don’t think it is necessary. We were asked to pay for it, we can’t see the results, the report–would you buy that project? They did not respect the history of religious in our country.” And,  “as to where it’s going, I don’t think anyone has a clue; frankly I don’t really care.”
  • A scene of prayer/protest against deportations of (illegal) immigrants outside a deportation center, with people praying the rosary. A sister is having a confrontation with the police. The Sisters’ perseverence eventually paid off, “now we are permitted inside Broadview. There are so few families present compared with people being deported (ie, most do not have family on hand on their deportation day to support them because of distance or other factors). We are there for all those who don’t have anyone there to support them. We give information on who will meet them, a group in Juarez, Mexico…. When people hear that we are actually in the deportation center on the day of deportation and families can bring bags and we can go on the buses on the way to the airport, people can’t believe that.” (my friend and I both liked this, I’d say this was what I actually kinda liked in the film)
  • Following scenes of Santuario Sisterfarm and stuff from Thomas Berry about everything, all life forms, being descended from the same source and bonded in a single community of life, Sr Nancy Sylvester appears to express a pantheistic/panentheistic belief: “the universe itself is a manifestation of God.” The language for that in different religions is different, because “we didn’t know then what we know today.” (I would call this post-Christian)
  • Sr Patricia Siemen says “difficulty comes when we privilege one species over others, and diminish others. The Church has a stewardship model, I teach my students a partnership model.” She runs something called the Center for Earth Jurisprudence. “We need to recognize they have the same right to exist that we have, their right came from the same source as ours…. We need to expand our concept of justice, justice toward the planet.”
  • Sr Margaret Galiardi (of The Spiritual Life Center, a “non denominational” peace/justice/earth center) says our role as Christians and humans is to reconnect and realize not only we but all institutions built on the false premise we are separate from earth.
  • Sr Nancy Sylvester says “social justice to me is becoming more about living together with differences. Everyone has a right, including the other species, to come to their full potential.” These (decidedly novel) ideas “only came out when we had the freedom to explore these things.”
  • Sister Nancy Sylvester today leads the Center for Communal Contemplation, which has a big theme of “engaging impasse”. Their program is kind of hard to explain but they have these intense group processes geared toward, well, liberal change-making. (my friend was particularly bothered by these scenes and interpreted the intimate “communal contemplation” process as psychologically manipulative) “To change consciousness is the next stage of systemic change.”
  • “The Gospel needs to be interpreted in this new way.” The cleansing of the temple, for instance: Jesus was really annoyed with the moneychangers. What does “my Father’s house” refer to in context? The temple. “The universe opens up these texts, coming to deeper understanding, interpreting it with a wider lens.”
  • Sr Nancy says, “it is a cosmology that doesn’t have a heaven and a hell, not a three level universe anymore.” (I can hardly believe she said that)
  • There is a protest chant addressed to President Obama to stop the deportations.
  • “Religious life is a great thing, but not supposed to be big, not thousands. We’re the reminder there is something else we are in this for.”
  • At Santuario Sisterfarm it is stated “we’re not trying to be another church.”
  • Sr Nancy says we need reintegration of contemplation with our action.

I can only be honest, the sum of the movie does seem to express some different religion than the Catholic faith I know and that the Catechism describes.

One of the elderly Sisters in front of us told another, “I wonder if she went in the Academy Awards for best documentary!” I watched the face of the one Sister I noticed who was honestly wearing a habit, as she got up and left, and there was not happiness on that face.  It was attended by a hundreds, mostly Sinsinawa Dominican Sisters. I’m 34 and I did not notice anyone else around my age or younger. My friend “K” thought the average age might be about 60.

After the film there was a Q&A with the filmmaker, Mary Fishman. I messed up and forgot my camera at home, but dear “K” got cellphone pictures, here the Sister with the mic approaches her so she can ask a question:

sinsinawabandofsisters2

The questions were not too probing. The first one was, where are the two farms in the film–they are in New Jersey (Genesis) and Boerne, TX (Santuario). That sister in front of us asked next, “Have you been nominated for an Academy Award?” I think the answer was no.

Next, “K” got to ask a question.  She liked the work with the immigrants, and some of the mysticism. But she didn’t hear Jesus Christ mentioned. At this point I started clapping so much she got annoyed with me, I was hoping someone else would clap for love of Jesus, but no one did, and when I stopped, “K” continued, wondering why Scripture was not used more to unify.

Mary Fishman said, “I think that’s what the film is all about”, and pointed out the themes of social justice, etc as being actually about Jesus (later I think someone pointed out the mention of Jesus in the context of the scene of turning over the tables of the moneychangers. so there’s at least one, though it came immediately before Sr Nancy Sylvester let us know that in this new belief system they’re talking about, there’s no heaven or hell, so I am not clear on how Our Savior actually fits in). Mary didn’t attempt the second question.

The next question was actually a comment that I didn’t catch in full, “I really appreciated that you told the story of the Sisters by laying out the issues…” I can’t tell who said my next note, I think it was Mary, something about some elderly sisters are, if I heard correctly, “bloomers”, as they became free, Sisters had progression of life in the world.

A dear old Sister said happily “I saw so many people I knew, it’s like a reunion!” Another (or the same? my notes are far from perfect) said “The film was true to my lived experience. We’ve been part of something growing like yeast, we’ve been on a trajectory. You did it the best I’ve ever seen.” The next one I didn’t understand well, the speaker apologized for her imperfect English “I’m from Mexico but when I see the differences religious life is much different picture of what it means to be a Sister. I think Jesus is the identity of the Sisters.” This last part was responding to “K”‘s comment and supporting Mary Fishman’s answer.

A man commented “For us Dubuquers this was a wonderful complement to the Sisters in America museum exhibit.” This must refer to a traveling exhibit that was at the National Mississippi River Museum and Aquarium, in 2011.

I had my hand up and Sister brought me the microphone. I stood and said: “I am interested in why you chose to include in the film so many Sisters who dissent against the Church on various Catholic beliefs. For instance in particular I think of Sr Theresa Kane who we saw so famously supports “women’s ordination” though of course the Church has absolutely no authority to confer priestly ordination on women, and Sr Jeannine Grammick the well known supporter of homosexual behavior. And I’d like to know if all the Sisters in the film agree with their views. Thank you.”

“It takes a lot of of courage to ask that question,” said Mary Fishman. She didn’t ask the Sisters whether they all agreed with Sr Teresa and Sr Jeannine, she says. Theresa Kane and Jeannine Grammick speak to a lot of people. Also, the film is about Sisters over the last 50 years. And, some laity also have similar feelings. Vatican II said we need to listen to conscience. At times the Church doctrine has evolved. I don’t want to seem to tell people what to think, said Mary–we tried to edit in a way people can draw their own conclusions.

That was the last question, and after that some Sisters came up, not really to me, but to “K” and one Sister asked her what order she belonged to. And there ensued a very confused conversation. In hindsight it was really funny. In a big room full of Sisters in secular clothes, a lay woman looks like a Sister.

I had a series of conversations with very nice Sinsinawa Dominicans, asking each whether she believed in “women’s ordination”. Indeed all whom I spoke with thought it was possible. There was every appearance of pretty homogenous support for the content of the film. It did cross “K’s” mind and mine: how could someone get by and thrive in a community like this if they believed fully faithfully as the Church teaches? Both “K” and I had separate conversations in which a Sister told us, in response to our pointing to moral and doctrinal beliefs, Vatican II says we have to follow our conscience. I pointed out it also says we are gravely obliged to form our conscience in keeping with the Church, and that’s what Bishop Morlino has told us too. There was more to the conversations but I hardly remember and I am tired, and at any rate they were private conversations, and not really edifying ones. This post is long and perhaps overly-thorough, but that is the best I can do at the moment.

I believe public showings of this film do not belong in Catholic venues. I feel like this is the kind of material that a bishop should consider saying something if this film is scheduled for a Catholic venue in his diocese. I don’t have a sense of how broad an appeal it would have to non Catholic audiences other than new-agers. It’s a kind of insider tour of dissent, not by using the very biggest-name liberal Sisters like Joan Chittister or Sr Simone Campbell who you already know your opinion of, but other figures who’ve filled precisely the same leadership roles and hold similar views. It won’t tell you everything you need to know to understand who you’re seeing and what they’re up to, but what it does do is give a sufficiently informed viewer a rather eye opening portrait, crafted with extensive insider input from leading LCWR Sisters (though I assume not current–and the current ones should disown and distance themselves from this film, though I’m afraid they won’t), of quite a bit of what their crowd are actually up to and most keenly interested in. I do feel like I have a new understanding of that and why it’s described as post-Christian. This is some powerful evidence backing up the findings of the Doctrinal Assessment of the LCWR.

Please, pray for Sisters. We love them, need them so much, and we need them faithful to Jesus and His Church.

[Update: there was an earlier, longer trailer for this film, that someone found:]

[Update: no surprise:] Cardinal Newman Society’s blog reports that according to director Mary Fishman, “Fishman in a podcast with “A Nun’s Life Ministry” said she researched the documentary by reading the heterodox National Catholic Reporter as well as networking with the dissident Catholic organization Call to Action, a group that advocates female ordination. Call to Action showed the film at their annual conference in November.”

[Another update:] “acardnal” supplied this helpful video under Fr Z’s post about this. Ann Carey, an expert on the subject and author of the book Sisters in Crisis, explains what has happened to Sisters. An updated edition of her book is due to be released very soon.

24 Responses to “Band of Sisters” documentary about liberal women religious premiers at Sinsinawa Mound

  1. On January 14, 2013 at 8:36 am LoveGodAndAsHeLoved said:

    Excellent job again, Elizabeth! Thanks and praise to God for your hard work and extensive report. I could not wait to read this.

  2. […] the blog Laetificat, there is a report about the screening, at the Sinsinawa motherhouse of a film/documentary […]

  3. On January 14, 2013 at 9:03 am Michael Schumacher said:

    My only reaction is that of the holy Servant of God, Fr John Hardon, SJ’s famous conference on “The New Paganism” (part of his series on “Re-Evangelization”):

    The new pagan worships only one god, and that one god is man himself. This new paganism has assumed a variety of names, each beginning understandably with the adjective new. Some samples: it is called the New Theology, it is called the New Age, it is called the New Creation. This is a religion, it has worship, and ritual, to create the new man, so that the new man may create the new world… This new paganism idolizes each person’s own mind; it idolizes each person’s own will…The god is no longer the infinite Creator of the human race, it is man himself.

    (The whole conference is available on YouTube. It’s over an hour and a half, but all very important information from a very wise, very holy, very Catholic priest: Catholic Re-evangelization – Lesson 3 Neo Paganism)

    • On January 14, 2013 at 9:53 am Michael Schumacher said:

      Actually, I do have one more comment, in reaction to the awkward subtitle, “…. from Daughters of the Church to Citizens of the World” :

      You are of God, little children, and have overcome him [the Antichrist]. Because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world. They are of the world: therefore of the world they speak, and the world heareth them. We are of God. He that knoweth God heareth us. He that is not of God heareth us not. By this we know the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.

      I John 4, 4-6

  4. On January 14, 2013 at 9:12 am Andy said:

    Great reporting! Comprehensive. I hope this gets wide dissemination and it should since Fr. Z has posted on it. Keep up the good work.

  5. On January 14, 2013 at 9:32 am Richard said:

    I find the image of the nun in the title image for “Band of Sisters” misleading since it’s a nun in a habit.

  6. On January 14, 2013 at 12:39 pm mary martha said:

    Oh the Sinsinawa Dominicans… they never disappoint.

    I was educated by the Sinsinawas and was actually kicked out of a college theology class because I disagreed with the nun who was teaching. She maintained that since she was ‘more educated and smarter than nearly every pries’ she should be ordained. I quoted the Pope ont he issue of woman’s ordination and that set her off. She screamed at me I was never again welcome in her classroom and I had to complete the semester independent study with a different professor.

    I think that these sisters are really undone by the internet. It used to be that they could make their statements and people would listen and believe because they were Sisters and accorded an automatic respect for their education and position. Now I can Google quickly and see what quicksand they are standing on.

    • On January 14, 2013 at 2:57 pm Andy said:

      Mary Martha wrote, “I was educated by the Sinsinawas and was actually kicked out of a college theology class because I disagreed with the nun who was teaching. She maintained that since she was ‘more educated and smarter than nearly every pries’ she should be ordained.”

      I find that hilarious because there are also priests with all kinds of letters after their names who should NOT have been ordained! As if being “educated” means one is worthy to receive the sacrament of Holy Orders. Oh, maybe they don’t consider it a sacrament.

      I agree with what you said about the internet. It’s a convenient and expeditious vehicle to expose their heresies that didn’t exist pervasively back in the 60’s and 70’s.

  7. On January 14, 2013 at 6:43 pm TJM said:

    I find it despicable that these lefty nuns use a nun in a habit to introduce their lefty wares that helped destroyed their credibility and their orders.Maybe if they crawled back in their habits and teach what the Church teaches, maybe they’d attract some young, idealistic women. What these old gals are selling no one is buying

  8. On January 14, 2013 at 8:28 pm RevDB said:

    LOL to the whole thing.

  9. On January 15, 2013 at 8:19 am Stark Realities « Over the Rhine and Into the Tiber said:

    […] “Band of Sisters” documentary about liberal women religious premiers at Sinsinawa Mound […]

  10. On January 15, 2013 at 7:37 pm Christina King said:

    I am so grateful for this article, they have already removed the website showing that the Diocesan property was used for this schismatic film event, but I have screen shot the google cache. I looked into this today after Karl Keating from Catholic Answers posted today about the SinSinawa (interesting that sin is twice in the name) Mound Dominican nuns using new age Labyrinths in their retreat experiences. It was then I ran into all of the rest of this. I would have come with you had I known there was a public viewing as I am in Wisconsin. I’d love to talk to you on the air, I have a radio show with World Family of Radio Maria and I would like to discuss this on the air, are you busy next Monday at 10am central time? Thank you for faithfulness. Please email me and let me know if you could discuss this in further with me.

  11. On January 16, 2013 at 12:01 am Irenaeus said:

    It is truly sad, and angering at the same time

  12. […] Newman Society reported yesterday, the documentary takes a rather unorthodox bent, according to one Catholic writer. It profiles Sister Theresa Kane, who publicly confronted Pope John Paul II over the issue of […]

  13. On January 16, 2013 at 11:56 am Elizabeth said:

    Thank you for this timely article! I saw an article elsewhere this morning about some Dominican sisters and knew it must be the Sinsinawas. I was more interested than usual because it was about the upcoming showing of this film, with discussion afterwards, at a “catholic” college that I used to work for ~ Dominican University, in River Forest, IL.

    After reading the brief promo about it on their website, I wrote an email to them, cc’ing all the most prominent people there. It didn’t take long before I received a copy of one of their responses to the others, expressing her being “enraged” and suggesting they all get together in order to respond to me with one voice. I don’t think my email was that bad. I was simply honest. This is what I said:
    ********************************************
    I saw an article on a Catholic blog this morning about the upcoming event entitled “Band of Sisters” at Dominican University. Since I worked at Dominican for a brief period of time, I was interested in reading more about it.

    I write this brief note to express my disappointment that Dominican University and the Sinsinawa Dominicans have apparently not turned themselves around towards Rome. This documentary and the brief write-up on it tells me that your focus continues to be on social justice, “equality” in the Church, among other things.

    Is it true or just idle gossip that the Sinsinawas reject Church teaching regarding the intrinsic evil of abortion? Contraception? Homosexual so-called marriage? Priestly Celibacy? The male Priesthood? Do the Sinsinawas believe that Jesus is truly present in the Blessed Sacrament?

    Unfortunately these days, when one hears about a scandal involving Dominican Sisters, most informed orthodox Catholics automatically assume it must be the Sinsinawas.

    Perhaps there was a time long ago when the University and these Sisters were indeed truly Catholic and were devoted to Jesus Christ and His Church, to Rome, to the Bishops, and to assisting souls within their care to gain Heaven. When did that change for you, I wonder?

    Whenever I’m asked about my experience of working at Dominican, I always answer that I enjoyed my co-workers, the work, and made many friends. I enjoyed the beautiful grounds and the gorgeous old buildings that make up the old Rosary College. But I also respond that I had to resign as I came to find it unbearable to work in an environment that I had hoped would HELP me live my Faith, rather than risk losing it. When asked, I always recommend that Catholic parents do not send their children to Dominican University.

    ************************************************
    Was I too blunt? Oh well, it’s too late now to take it back!

    Thanks for a great site. God bless you.

    • On January 16, 2013 at 12:55 pm Elizabeth said:

      Elizabeth, I also contacted Dominican U, and received this reply today which was not at all a response to my concerns about the very serious doctrinal problems in the film:

      Elizabeth,

      I asked the director of our Siena Center, which is hosting the screening of Band of Sisters, to provide a response to your concern. She sent me the following this morning. I hope this allays some of your concerns. Thank you for taking the time to contact us and sharing your concern. Perhaps you’ll join us for the discussion following the film—your input would be welcome.

      [this part is from Claire Noonan, DMin, Director of the Siena Center:] The mission of the St. Catherine of Siena Center of Dominican University is to examine significant contemporary issues at the intersection of faith and culture for the benefit the university community, professional ministers and the wider community of faith. Its screening of the film Band of Sisters is part of a series celebrating the 50th anniversary of the Second Vatican Council. The series will also include lectures by Rev. Mark Massa, SJ, dean of the Boston College School of Theology and Ministry and Rev. Paul Philibert, OP, promoter of permanent formation for the Southern Dominican Province. Band of Sisters is a documentary narrating the development and expansion of the ministries of religious women in the United States in wake of the Council, and in response to pressing social issues, including immigration, environmental degradation, war, and the movement for gender equality. In keeping with the fundamental purpose of the university to pursue truth through the free exchange and critical examination of ideas, those with differing assessments of the significance, meaning and values of these developments are welcome to join the dialogue.

      Jessica Mackinnon
      Director of Public Information
      Dominican University

      and my reply, which I had to write in a hurry this morning, was this:

      Dear Jessica and Claire,

      Again Jessica, thank you very much for relaying my concerns. Claire, my concern is about the religious content of the film, which shows Catholic Sisters, but their religious beliefs are something substantially different than Catholic beliefs–post-Christian, even, since they don’t think humans should be privileged over other species, and say things like “the whole earth is a manifestation of God” and there was a bizarre comment from Sr Nancy Sylvester that the Sisters’ new cosmology has no heaven or hell (if she means what that seems to mean, she is also implying no need for our salvation from sin that Jesus so lovingly came for). I have only my own rough notes, available on my blog, to refer you to, to show that: http://www.laetificatmadison.com/2013/01/band-of-sisters-documentary-about-liberal-women-religious-premiers-at-sinsinawa-mound/ . The Second Vatican Council obviously did not call for doing away with Catholic doctrine or throwing all obedience to the wind, and did call both for following conscience and the grave necessity of forming conscience in accord with the Church. If anything, this film was about Vatican II being severely misinterpreted or abused.

      Please, reconsider showing this film.

      I will post another comment here if I receive a further reply.

      I think we need to be truthful but charitable and not go beyond what we can provide evidence for, or be too quick to accuse a whole group of people for ALL believing x, y and z.

      The Cardinal Newman Society is reporting today (together with the news that Notre Dame also plans to show the film) that “Fishman in a podcast with “A Nun’s Life Ministry” said she researched the documentary by reading the heterodox National Catholic Reporter as well as networking with the dissident Catholic organization Call to Action, a group that advocates female ordination. Call to Action showed the film at their annual conference in November.”

      • On January 16, 2013 at 1:14 pm Elizabeth said:

        Well, Elizabeth, I like your letter much better than mine! I know that I tend to speak (and write) in the moment, without giving proper thought of how it sounds. I shouldn’t lump all Sinsinawas together or all those who work or teach at Dominican. When will I learn?

        • On January 16, 2013 at 1:27 pm Elizabeth said:

          Yeah, I think one must remember there are some good Sinsinawa Dominicans. A local priest here in Madison, WI told me of a Sinsinawa Dominican, Sr Ana Luisa Cespeda, who he said wears a habit and did great work building a solid Hispanic ministry in the eastern part of our diocese, I found there is an article about her in our diocesan newspaper. And if you go to this blog post of mine there is a photograph of a Sinsinawa Dominican in a habit, talking with the Cathedral rector Msgr Kevin Holmes, a long ago former pupil of hers when she was a schoolteacher. I don’t know that Sister or her name, but something tells me she isn’t the “women priests” type.

  14. On January 18, 2013 at 2:18 pm CJ Haley said:

    I was “raised” by Dominican sisters. After Vatican II the sisters went off into lala land. Unrecognizable. No habits. Unknown street names. The newsletter reflected(s) new age. I don’t respect them anymore; at least not this branch of Dominicans. I am so encouraged by newer orders, who wear the habit, who obey the church, who respect the Pope. Pictures of happy young women in the Dominican habit. When I was in the 6th grade I had a nun who hated me. Won’t go into the details. Years later I confronted her. She passed away recently. She was faithful to her vows and not a new ager. Bless Sister Bertrand. I know she rests in peace. This film interests me not. Tired of hearing the blather of those who are trying to make the Catholic church into their dream and our nightmare.

  15. On January 18, 2013 at 10:45 pm ubipetrusest said:

    I met the whacky Sinsinawa Dominicans 38 years ago when our parish was “served” by them. I only knew 3, and they were all “off.” We moms argued when Sister said she would not tell our kids it was a sin to miss Sunday Mass, but that the Christian community had met together on Sunday since the early days of Christianity. The other two I met, one of whom was the principal, gave more weight to psychological and social workers’ “advice” than to the truths of Christianity. They were poor formers and guardians of our precious children, and it seems just that their unfaithfulness is leading to the end of their orders.Let’s pray they are reconciled with the Church and their chosen spouse, Jesus Christ, before they die. Today young practicing Catholic women are entering convents and forming new associations where the sisters wear the habit and lead a traditional religious life, while the women in this film and their cohorts are debating what to do with the assets of the order when there are no more members alive.

  16. On January 20, 2013 at 1:49 am Nicole Smith said:

    It looks like from the trailer the film should be named: Band of Transvestites.

  17. On January 20, 2013 at 7:03 am Avery said:

    “We’ve been part of something growing like yeast, we’ve been on a trajectory.”

    Indeed. A trajectory away from Christ.

  18. On April 15, 2013 at 10:18 pm Gabriel said:

    I was educated by the Sinsinawa Domincans. The sisters I encountered varied greatly. Some said they missed the Latin Mass. Others were adamantly pro-life. Others fit the stereotype of a liberal 1960s dissident nun. The Sinsinawas get a lot of bad press, but I know for a fact that they have some good, loyal Catholic sisters among them.

    When the Sister you mentioned said, “We are doing exactly what the Church told us to”, she wasn’t kidding. Being an obedient religious means following the formation and teaching you are given. Many “progressive” religious are progressive because of instruction and formation they received by legitimate authority.

    I ask everyone reading this to pray for the Sinsinawas and all the religious who serve The Lord, however imperfectly.

    • On April 15, 2013 at 11:02 pm Elizabeth said:

      I highly endorse this comment, especially the call to pray for them; we need to have a respectful and loving attitude toward all Sisters. I have a strong admiration and love for the history and accomplishments of the Sinsinawa Dominican Sisters and I know more than a few really, really, really fine Catholics who were taught by them. Sisters who did so much good deserve our thanks.

      The more I have learned, the more clearly I know that it’s not true that they did “exactly what the Church told us to do.” In some ways they did what the Church told them to do (and there were some who were true-blue holy women who never went along with the radical feminism and dissent). But they took it way too far and in uncalled for directions–in so many ways, what they did was NOT what Vatican II told them to do, but the opposite, and it was NOT what the various post-conciliar documents told them to do, but the opposite, and it was NOT what the Holy See directly told them to do, but the opposite. But the people who got in control, of the LCWR and of the Sinsinawa Dominicans, were the “change-oriented” Sisters and they were not really accommodating of the ones who wanted to stay true to the Catholic Church’s idea of how religious life is meant to be lived. A great read that tells the story of what happened in great detail, based straight from the LCWR archives and so many other key sources, is the book Sisters In Crisis by Ann Carey, a new edition of which is going to come out soon, I think next month.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

%d bloggers like this: